Burdine v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Noojin v. State · Stahl v. State · Hardiman v. State · Jenkins v. State · Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(tlhe amount of time that has passed between the event and the statement is relevant but not dispostive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Rogers v. State · Hammon v. State“Because the foundational requirements to admissibility often require factual determinations by the trial court, these findings are entitled to the same deference on appeal as any other factual finding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Forler v. State“When a trial court admits hearsay testimony pursuant to an exception, we review such admission under an abuse of discretion standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Forler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.