Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Wright · Carter v. State · Bustamante v. State · Cooper v. State · Bunch v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court's sentencing discretion includes the determination of whether to increase presumptive penalties, impose consecutive sentences on multiple convictions, or both. In doing so, the trial court determines which aggravating and mitigating cireumstances to consider, and is solely responsible for determining the weight to accord each of these factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moyer v. State“The presumptive sentence assigned to a given class of felony is the penalty determined by the legislature to be appropriate for the standard erime committed by the standard criminal, in other words, where aggravators and mitigators rest at approximate equipoise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Farmer v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.