Guance v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2002
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Young · Ake v. Oklahoma · Hope v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The standard of review for ineffective assistance of counsel is two-pronged: first, appellant must show that counsel's performance was deficient; second, appellant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced his defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). There is a strong presumption that counsel's con duct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional conduct, ie., appellant must overcome the presumption that, under the cireumstances, counsel's conduct constituted sound trial strategy. Id. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. [at]2065."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a eriminal conviction is not to be lightly overturned on the basis of a prosecutor's comments standing alone, for the fairness must be viewed in context”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.