Naranjo v. Naranjo’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Burt v. Burt (1990), Bradford v. Bradford (1999)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. Jones · Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh · English v. English · Davis v. Davis · Paffel v. Paffel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We afford the trial court ‘considerable latitude in adjusting financial and property interests, and its actions are entitled to a presumption of validity.’ Accordingly, changes will be made in a trial court’s property division determination in a divorce action ‘only if there was a misunderstanding or misapplication of the law resulting in substantial and prejudicial error, the evidence clearly preponderated against the findings, or such a serious inequity has resulted as to manifest a clear abuse of discretion.’ ””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'There is no fixed formula upon which to determine a division of properties in a divorce action[;] the trial court has considerable latitude in adjusting financial and property interests, and its actions are entitled to a presumption of validity.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Ithere is no fixed formula upon which to determine a division of properties in a divoree action[.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.