Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 P2D 388 - Baldwin v. Dube

Baldwin v. Dube’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2014

22 state decisions

901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGuire v. McGuire · Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Ass'n v. State · Madison v. Marlatt · Murphy v. Stevens · Hoke v. Welsh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`the intentional relinquishment of a known right and must be manifest in some unequivocal manner.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * [Olne having some legal significance, that is, under the law applicable to a given case, it would control in some way the legal relations of the parties; as one upon which the outcome of litigation depends in whole or in part; as one on which the controversy may be determined; as one which will affect the result or outcome of the case depending upon its resolution; and one which constitutes a part of the plaintiff's cause of action or of the defendant's defense. A fair summary of these definitions is that for purposes of ruling upon a motion for summary judgment a fact is material if proof of that fact would have the effect of establishing or refuting one of the essential elements of a cause of action or defense asserted by the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Absence from the record of a specific basis upon which summary judgment was sought or granted is a handicap to the reviewing court, although specific bases are not mandatory under the rule.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.