People v. Chippewa’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably People v. Birdsong (1998), Kazadi v. People (2012)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Gutierrez · People v. Canino · People v. Bossert · State v. Stephens · People v. Lesh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where a defendant may be surprised or influenced into a plea of guilty when he had a defense; where a plea of guilty was entered by mistake or under a misconception of the nature of the charge”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Kazadi v. People · People v. Boling“a plea can be withdrawn if the defendant makes a showing that denial of the request will subvert justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Davis · People v. Boling“Id. at 1237 . Here, Harvey's misunderstanding was a factual rather than a legal one, as he had been correctly advised of the potential legal consequences of his plea and it was his own misunderstanding of his criminal history that led to his belief about how he would be sentenced. Neither does Chippewa support Harvey's position, as the court there did not reach the question of whether the defendant's plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily, but instead considered only whether the defendant had provided a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.