Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 P.2d 822 - State v. Fletcher

State v. Fletcher’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2001

1 district · 5 state decisions

40198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Bouie v. City of Columbia · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · United States v. District Court · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · United States v. Unicorn Enterprises, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any proceeds derived, whether directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity in which such person has participated, as a principal, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of such proceeds, or the proceeds derived from the investment or use thereof, in the acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or operation of, any enterprise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “at least two episodes of racketeering conduct which have the same or similar objectives, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.