Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 SO2D 104 - Gesell v. State

Gesell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · State v. Van Pieterson · 714 So. 2d 536 - Raulerson v. State · 553 So. 2d 370 - Cannon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this case, as in Raulerson , the officers did not conduct any surveillance or independent follow-up investigation to corroborate the anonymous tip, perform additional garbage pulls, or develop any other facts to show a pattern of continuous drug activity and establish a fair probability that cannabis would be found on the premises. Moreover, there was nothing found in the contents of the trash here that, in and of itself, supported a reasonable conclusion that additional contraband would be found in the house.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.