Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 So. 2d 1155 - Brown v. State

751 So. 2d 1155 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · Carr v. State · 665 So. 2d 852 - Eakes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[T]he trial judge shall not be put in error for his failure to instruct on any point of law unless specifically requested in writing to do so.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining whether a jury verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, this Court must accept as true the evidence presented as supportive of the verdict, and we will disturb a jury verdict only when convinced that the circuit court has abused its discretion in failing to grant a new trial or if the final result will result in an unconscionable injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “include the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness' [sic] degree of attention, the accuracy of the witness' [sic] prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation, and the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.