Buice v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Hernandez v. Ylst · 582 So. 2d 428 - Luckett v. State · 493 So. 2d 933 - Bryant, Inc. v. Walters · 562 So. 2d 1206 - Riely v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Court records show that a petition for revocation of probation was filed January 13, 1977, approximately eleven (11) days prior to the expiration of the probationary period. We hold that this tolled the running of the five (5) year period, and since the petition was filed prior to the end of the probationary period and the lower court acted on the petition within a reasonable time (13 days) that the revocation of probation and sentence of three (3) years was lawful. If this were not the law, then a probationer who violates his probation on the last day of the five (5) year period would have to be caught and given a hearing that day or his probation could not be revoked. Such reasoning would be absurd and is not the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“as contemplated by section 47-7-37, rather than by a probation officer. Second, a revocation petition was filed prior to the expiration of Leech's probationary period. Therefore, we do not find Ellis and Simpson controlling. Instead, pursuant to Jackson, we find that the filing of the revocation petition was sufficient action to toll the running of Leech's probationary period, if it is determined that the State acted on the petition within a reasonable time. ¶ 19.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Our law presumes that the judgment of the trial court is correct, and the appellant has the burden of demonstrating some reversible error to this Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.