Doerr v. Doerr’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Farrior v. Farrior · Johnson v. Johnson · 692 So. 2d 283 - Dal Ponte v. Dal Ponte · 657 So. 2d 1214 - Walton v. Walton · 712 So. 2d 1154 - Farrior v. Farrior
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The cut-off date for determining assets and liabilities to be identified or classified as marital assets and liabilities is the earliest of the date the parties enter into a valid separation agreement, such other date as may be expressly established by such agreement, or the date of the filing of a petition for dissolution of marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Krakower v. Krakower
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.