Bandy v. Sheffield

Fabian BANDY, Appellant, v. Frank SHEFFIELD, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 2000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-02-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2001

2 state decisions

Relies on Gonzalez v. Moore

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-02-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Fabian Bandy, Pro Se.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The lower court should not have dismissed the appellant's mandamus petition without clarifying what additional filings were needed to comport with the case management order, and without then giving the appellant a reasonable amount of time within which to comply. See Gonzalez v. Moore,743 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The appealed order is therefore reversed and the case is remanded.

¶5ALLEN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.