Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 SO2D 533 - Holliday v. State

Holliday v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2014

9 state decisions

60199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 500 So. 2d 1179 - Ex Parte Cochran · 401 So. 2d 204 - Ferguson v. State · 401 So. 2d 191 - Nobis v. State · 523 So. 2d 1118 - Ex Parte Rutledge · 425 So. 2d 500 - Gwin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`When a prospective juror is subject to challenge for cause or it reasonably appears that the prospective juror cannot or will not render a fair and impartial verdict, the court, on its own initiative or on motion of any party, shall excuse that juror from service in the case.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “and return a verdict based on the evidence presented.' Id. ) See also Forehand v. State , 624 So.2d 688 , 695-96 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993) (`[In] the absence of any follow-up questioning of Juror 118, the appellant failed to establish the juror's probable prejudice and the trial court correctly denied the challenge for cause.' Bowen, Judge, concurring.).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Black v. State , 596 So.2d 40 , 41 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991) (`the trial judge failed to elicit from the prospective juror whether he could lay aside his”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.