Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 So. 2d 630 - Gomez v. State

751 So. 2d 630 - Gomez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 719 So. 2d 1197 - Gore v. State · 479 So. 2d 850 - Borden, Inc. v. Young · Pacifico v. State · 641 So. 2d 427 - Bellsouth Human Resources v. Colatarci · 724 So. 2d 124 - Izquierdo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When objections are sustained and the trial court considers it proper to admonish counsel, it should be done outside the jury's presence. However, if counsel continues to engage in improper comments and arguments, the trial judge should admonish counsel and advise them that future improper tactics will cause counsel to be rebuked before the jury. This has a magical effect!”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial court retains the ultimate responsibility for the proper conduct of trial counsel and trial proceedings in her courtroom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “encroached on the jury's job by improperly weighing in with her own opinion of the credibility of the witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.