751 So. 2d 633 - Soto v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ornelas v. United States · Trident Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co. · Brooks v. Tennessee · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact that a juror expresses concern for his or her personal life while the trial is going on is insufficient to show that the juror is so objectionable as to render a denial of additional peremptory challenges to remove that juror reversible error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Saffold v. State“There is no rule which requires the trial court to postpone the trial indefinitely to accommodate a defendant's indecision regarding whether he will testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Walden“pointing to a juror who was concerned about child care as an objectionable juror whom the defense would have struck had it been granted more challenges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Saffold v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.