Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 SO2D 68 - Lawrence v. Walker

Lawrence v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 377 So. 2d 1150 - Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he appellant complains that he did not know that the hearing would not be recorded or reported. He assumed that this was a criminal proceeding and that all such proceedings are recorded. A petition for an injunction against domestic violence, however, is a civil proceeding, and as yet there is no requirement that such matters be transcribed at public expense. Therefore, the party must arrange in advance for the reporting and transcription of the proceedings. It is indeed unfortunate that parties frequently are unaware of this requirement until after the fact. With so much litigation being conducted pro se, it seems to me that in the notice for the final hearing on the injunction the parties should be alerted that if they want the hearing reported it is up to them to arrange for the services of a court reporter to transcribe the proceedings. Without a record, a party’s ability to exercise their appellate rights is, in most cases, lost before the final judgment is ever entered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.