¶1Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient motion to correct sentence raising his claim regarding the constitutionality of the Gort Act. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b); State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999); Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315, 317 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
751 So. 2d 703
Davis v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 9, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-02-09
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2012
12 state decisions
Relies on 750 So. 2d 643 - State v. Thompson · 708 So. 2d 315 - Thompson v. State · Vining v. Segal
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-02-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →