Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

751 So. 2d 766

McKinney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-03-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2001

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 797 So. 2d 1253 - McKinney v. State

Relies on 740 So. 2d 520 - Jones v. State · 740 So. 2d 20 - Woods v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-03-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appealed orders are affirmed. As in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999), we certify the following question of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
BARFIELD, C.J., ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.
/751/so2d/766 · .json · Public domain