Gill v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2010
4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Paintsville Hospital Co. v. Rose · Wall v. Lewis · Adams v. Ison · Daugherty v. Runner · Conway v. Huff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would require a client to hire a backup lawyer to continually review the work of the primary lawyer.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Notwithstanding any other prescribed limitation of actions which might otherwise appear applicable ... a civil action, whether brought in tort or contract, arising out of any act or omission in rendering, or failing to render, professional services for others shall be brought within one (1) year from the date of the occurrence or from the date when the cause of action was, or reasonably should have been, discovered by the party injured. Time shall not commence against a party under legal disability until removal of the disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] party is responsible to know the date on which a cause of action is or reasonably should have been discovered. It is that knowledge, whether actual or imputed, that triggers the start of any applicable statute of limitations____ Knowledge that one has been wronged starts the running of the statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.