Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 SW2D 579 - Stone v. State

Stone v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 337th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Almanza v. State · Hernandez v. State · Ex Parte Duffy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even had defense counsel properly objected to the two prior convictions about which he complains on appeal and the two convictions excluded from evidence, the jury still would have had before them five prior convictions. Based upon this record, we are unable to say that there is a reasonable probability that the jury’s decision as to punishment would have been any different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.