Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 751 SW2D 623 - Hellman v. Mateo

Hellman v. Mateo’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 281st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Authority · Swilley v. Hughes · Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co. · Morrison v. Chan · Nelson v. Krusen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e [do not] find that appellant [Hellman] expressly raised the fact issue that she could not have discovered the wrong when she learned that she had Hodgkins disease and brought suit within the two year period, in order to raise the constitutionality of article 4590i as applied to her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.