Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 752 F.2d 206 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

752 F.2d 206 · 1985

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
5
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably United States v. Ismaili (1987), In Re Dow Corning Corp. (2000)

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

1601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3503 · 18 U.S.C. § 6003 · 28 U.S.C. § 1826

Relies on Shillitani v. United States · Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. v. City of Chicago · United States v. Louisiana · Moore v. United States · Mandel v. Nouse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]tatements of an attorney that are directly related to the litigation at hand have been held to be within the attorney's scope of authority and binding on the client.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although [the Fifth Amendment] privilege is personal to the client, it can be invoked on the client's behalf by the attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.