Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 752 F.2d 254 - Mars v. Hanberry

Mars v. Hanberry’s Empirical Analysis

752 F.2d 254 · 1985

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Lavado v. Keohane (1993), Knop v. Johnson (1992)

19 federal appellate · 2 district ·

21019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton · Maclin v. Freake · Childs v. Duckworth · McKeever v. Israel · Wright v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ppointment of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) is not appropriate when a pro se litigant's claims are frivolous ... or when the chances of success are extremely slim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.