Oglesby v. RCA Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
752 F.2d 272 · 1985
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Coleman v. Commissioner (1986), Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc. (1993)
38 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 781 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 654 (§ 5 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970) · 29 U.S.C. § 660 (§ 11 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970) · 42 U.S.C. § 2011 (Atomic Energy Act of 1954)
Relies on Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is settled law that all rights and claims arising from a collective bargaining agreement . . . arise under federal law, and while state courts are not deprived of jurisdiction in such cases, in exercising his jurisdiction state courts are bound to apply only federal law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The state law in cases necessarily rooted in Section 301, LMRA has been completely pre-empted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“that plaintiff had simply alleged a cause of action for wrongful discharge and if shown to be in violation of a collective bargaining agreement subject to Section 301, LMRA, the action arises under federal law and the fact that it was not characterized in the complaint as a federal claim is not determinative.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.