Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 752 F.2d 327 - Ryder v. Morris

Ryder v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

752 F.2d 327 · 1985

Citation profile

117
cited by 117 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

82 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Rodriguez (1985), State v. Parker (2010)

82 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

8501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Stone v. Powell · United States v. Tucker · Hormel v. Helvering

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we cannot say that the [opportunity for full and fair litigation] requirement is satisfied only in those cases in which a state appellate court has actually addressed the fourth amendment issues”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] judge may appropriately conduct an inquiry broad in scope, largely unlimited either as to the kind of information he may consider, or the source from which it may come.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A trial court has wide discretion in making a sentencing determination; but sentences based on material misinformation or erroneous assumptions may violate due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.