Pina v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
752 F.2d 47 · 1985
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Ritchie (2003), Clicks Billiards Inc Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc an Arizona Corporation (2001)
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Rideout v. United States · Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Barefoot v. Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court should not go outside the record to supply a fact that is an essential part of a party's case unless the fact is clearly beyond dispute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hether the report was even prepared is not a proper subject of judicial notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re MMD“United States v. LeRoy , 687 F.2d 610 , 618 (2d Cir. 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.