United States v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis
752 F.2d 741 · 1985
Citation profile
54 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Lema v. United States (1993), United States v. Wihbey (1996)
54 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3060 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Griffin v. California · United States v. Hasting · Culombe v. Connecticut
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'we consider the severity of the misconduct, whether it was deliberate or accidental, the likely effect of the curative instruction, aagainst appellant[ ].'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“relevant danger lurking in the [remarks] that followed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.