Efstathiadis v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
752 F.3d 591 · 2014
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Yan Chen v. Gonzales · Weng v. Holder · Moncrieffe v. Holder · Gill v. Immigration & Naturalization Services · SILVA-TREVINO
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While a petition is pending in this Court, the Government's forbearance policy assures that the filing of a motion to stay removal, as has been done here, will suffice to prevent removal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]ecause [i]t is in the intent that moral turpitude inheres, the focus of the analysis is generally on the mental state reflected in the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whether a crime is one involving moral turpitude depends on the offender's evil intent or corruption of the mind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.