Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 752 F.3d 708 - Kvapil v. Chippewa County

Kvapil v. Chippewa County’s Empirical Analysis

752 F.3d 708 · 2014

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
October 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Scott v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A genuine dispute as to any material fact exists if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “construe all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the movant [must] show[ ] that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.