752 F. Supp. 2d 412 - Santos v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Tejada v. Apfel · Rutherford v. Barnhart · Mimms v. Heckler · Trichilo v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The plaintiff's] proposed hourly rate ... [is] based upon the most recent Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Commissioner does not dispute these rates and the Court finds them to be reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Hogan v. Astrue , 539 F.Supp.2d 680 , 682 (W.D.N.Y. 2008).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.