752 F. Supp. 2d 797 - Kropf v. TCA, INC.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Neitzke v. Williams · Erickson v. Pardus · Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council · Mayer v. Mylod
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o recover attorney’s fees under the FDCPA, the prevailing defendant must show affirmatively that the plaintiff brought the FDCPA claim in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not create an independent cause of action for attorney’s fees”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.