State v. Gauster’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably State v. Thompson (2019), State v. William L. Witt(074468) (2015)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ross · South Dakota v. Opperman · Colorado v. Bertine · California v. Acevedo · Maryland v. Dyson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When reviewing a district court's pretrial order on a motion to suppress evidence, [this court] review[s] the district court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard and the district court's legal determinations de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bradley“[appellate courts] generally will not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal”). 4 . That statute provided:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“searches. U.S. Const. amend. IV ; Minn. Const. art. I, § 10. A warrantless search is”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Leonard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.