Rebollar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 22, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-03-22

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2002

2 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · 735 So. 2d 525 - Grantham v. State · Bogdanowicz v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-03-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this Anders1 appeal, appellant’s counsel raises three issues of possible error. After a thorough review of the record, we find no merit in the first two issues and affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and his resulting sentence without discussion. We do, however, agree with appellant’s contention in Issue III, that a sentencing memorandum is insufficient to serve as a written order of revocation. We, accordingly, remand with directions for entry of such an order. See Wagner v. State, 744 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Grantham v. State, 735 So.2d 525 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

¶2Remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).