752 So. 2d 293 - State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson · State v. Mims
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[d]ismissing the appeal would simply result in a delay of the appellate process and hinder defendant's right to appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]lthough . . . [the officer] did not go into detail concerning the information he had received by telling the jury the name and description, the jury could nevertheless have . . . inferred that [the defendant] Thompson was the person whose first name and description were confirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.