752 So. 2d 39 - Gonzalez v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 571 So. 2d 422 - Goldschmidt v. Holman · 523 So. 2d 196 - Orange County v. Piper · 502 So. 2d 940 - Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McKenzie · Auster v. Strax Breast Cancer Institute · 584 So. 2d 579 - CSX Transp., Inc. v. Whittler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Florida law is clear that decisions regarding jury instructions rest within the sound discretion of the trial court and should not be overturned on appeal absent a showing of prejudicial error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(2) The driver of a vehicle emerging from an alley, building, private road or driveway within a business or residence district shall stop the vehicle immediately prior to driving onto a sidewalk or onto the sidewalk area extending across the alley, building entrance, road or driveway, or in the event there is no sidewalk area, shall stop at the point nearest the street to be entered where the driver has a view of approaching traffic thereon and shall yield to all vehicles and pedestrians which are so close thereto as to constitute an immediate hazard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beeman v. Cosmides
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.