Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 752 So. 2d 440 - George v. State

752 So. 2d 440 - George v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · United States v. Powell · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “, in the sense that a jury has not followed the court's instruction, most certainly has occurred, but it is unclear whose ox has been gored. Given this uncertainty, it is hardly satisfactory to allow the defendant to receive a new trial on the conviction as a matter of course.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]nconsistent or even contradictory verdicts are not, in and of themselves, reasons to overturn a criminal conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.