Kessler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Kirby v. Illinois · 109 So. 2d 7 - Singer v. State · 570 So. 2d 925 - Czubak v. State · Huff v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A juror should be excused for cause if there is any reasonable doubt about the juror's ability to render an impartial verdict.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Suri v. State · Whitby v. State“prevented defense counsel from developing an accurate picture of the impact of the article on juror Mengel, for had counsel attempted to do so the information would have been broadcast to the entire venire. Defense counsel, for instance, was unable to gauge the following: Whether Mengel had focused closely on the article when he read it; whether he had understood and absorbed the details of the article; whether he had found the article credible; and whether he had experienced a gut-level reaction to the article. The State contends that it is enough that Mengel averred that he possessed an open mind and could render a fair verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial. We disagree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.