Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 752 SO2D 798 - In re Smith

In re Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 486 So. 2d 116 - La. State Bar Ass'n v. Hinrichs · In re White · Guillot v. Munn · In re Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). The misconduct at issue in Smith I was extremely serious and included, among other things, respondent's conversion of client and third-party funds, neglect of legal matters, failure to communicate with clients, failure to refund unearned fees, and failure to cooperate with the ODC in its investigation. Against this backdrop, we now turn to a consideration of the misconduct at issue in the present proceeding. FORMAL CHARGES The Thompson Matter In March 1998, while representing Cecil and Sandra Thompson in a personal injury matter, respondent guaranteed payment of the Thompsons' debt to Azimuth Financial Corporation ("Azimuth”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.