752 So. 2d 934 - State v. Lawrence’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 628 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Foret · 559 So. 2d 1321 - State v. Wille · State v. Thomas · 688 So. 2d 473 - State v. Hawkins · State Ex Rel. Porter v. Butler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining that the erroneous admission of testimony does not require reversal of a conviction, the reviewing court must be convinced that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Statements made for purposes of medical treatment and medical diagnosis in connection with treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to treatment or diagnosis in connection with treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“because neither doctor testified that any medical treatment was prescribed as a result of their interviews and exams, the hearsay exception of Article 803(4), under which they were offered, did not apply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Merritt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.