State v. Balthrop’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1993
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rhode Island v. Innis · Brewer v. Williams · PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins · United States v. Mitchell · State v. Randolph
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 16(a)(1)(A), Tenn.R.Crim.P., requires the state to reveal the substance of any oral statement made by an accused in response to an officer’s interrogation if it is intended to be used in evidence. The state says this rule is not applicable in this case because they do not have to reveal rebuttal evidence on discovery. We do not agree with this proposition. The rule makes no exception for statements to be used in rebuttal, and to hold that it does would greatly diminish the value of the rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jenkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.