Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 386 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 402 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Harris v. State (1989), Marin v. State (1993)
2 federal appellate · 386 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2117
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Gardner v. Florida · Lisenba v. People of State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 402 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the appellate record in a criminal case reveals error in the proceedings below, the appellate court shall reverse the judgment under review, unless the appellate court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the error made no contribution to the conviction or to the punishment.”
52 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Dennis v. State · Payne v. State“You are not to discuss among yourselves how long the accused would be required to serve the sentence that you impose. Such matters come within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Board of Pardons and Paroles and the Governor of the State of Texas, and must not be considered by you.”
28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Woods v. State · Hupp v. State“You may consider the existence of the parole law and good conduct time. However, you are not to consider the extent to which good conduct time may be awarded to or forfeited by this particular defendant. You are not to consider the manner in which the parole law may be applied to this particular defendant.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Gil v. State · Evans v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.