State v. Anding’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2011
4 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Butz v. Hein · Idaho ex rel. Evans v. Oregon · Gullett v. States · State v. Franco · State v. Stapleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record in this case clearly indicates that defendant was either guilty of deliberate, premeditated murder or of nothing at all. If the State’s evidence is believed defendant, contracted to have [the victim] murdered more than a year before the murder took place. During that year defendant allegedly planned the murder with the help of [his accomplice]. The time of the murder was purposefully set to coincide with a time when defendant was out of the state. The brutal slaying of [the victim] was carried out while the victim was being held down in his chair. There are simply no facts in this case upon which to conclude that the killing of [the victim] was provoked or was committed without deliberation, malice, and premeditation. Consequently, the trial court erred in instructing the jury on manslaughter because there was no evidence to support such an instruction. [The instructions and case law] requiring automatic submission of manslaughter should not be followed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martindale““The record in this case clearly indicates that defendant was either guilty of deliberate, premeditated murder or of nothing at all. If the State’s evidence is believed defendant contracted to have [the victim] murdered more than a year before the murder took place. During that year defendant allegedly planned the murder with the help of ... Chandler. The time of the murder was purposefully set to coincide with a time when defendant was out of the state.... There are simply no facts in this case upon which to conclude that the killing ... was provoked or was committed without deliberation, malice, and premeditation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carlile“Procedural rules adopted by MAI cannot change the substantive law and must therefore be interpreted in the light of existing statutory and case law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.