Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

753 A.2d 1014

In re Hernandez

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2000-06-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2013

3 state decisions

Relies on In Re Goldsborough

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1In its Report and Recommendation, a copy of which is attached hereto, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Humberto Hernandez, a member of the District of Columbia Bar, be disbarred on account of his conviction of a crime of moral turpitude. Neither Bar Counsel nor Hernandez filed an exception to the recommendation. See In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1287 (D.C.1995). Substantially for the reasons stated by the Board, we conclude that the conspiracy offense to which Hernandez entered a plea of guilty involves moral turpitude within the meaning of D.C.Code § 11 — 2508(a) (1995). Accordingly, we adopt the recommendation of the Board, and Humberto Hernandez is hereby disbarred.

¶2So ordered.1

¶3. Hernandez’ attention is directed to the requirements of D.C.App. R. XI, § 14.

/753/a2d/1014 · .json · Public domain