36 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1466, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,966 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the City of New York, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Local 638 ... Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local 28 Joint Apprenticeship ..., Sheet Metal and Air-Conditioning Contractors' Association of New York City, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Local 28, Third-Party v. New York State Division of Human Rights, Third-Party Defendant-Plaintiff-Appellee. Local 28 Joint Apprenticeship Committee, Fourth-Party v. New York State Division of Human Rights, Fourth-Party’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638 (1996), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local International Association of Bridge Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers (1991)
4 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Regents of the University of California v. Bakke · Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' and the [appellants] have not 'been reasonably diligent and energetic in attempting to accomplish what was ordered.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“although plaintiffs may have been in the best position to bring defendants' violations to the attention of the district court, it was the defendants who were charged with reasonable diligence and making energetic efforts to comply with the orders of the court. Their attempt to shift the onus of inactivity to plaintiffs is misguided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the effect of reverse discrimination must not be 'identifiable', that is to say, concentrated upon a relatively small, ascertainable group of non-minority persons,” was satisfied because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.