Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 753 F.2d 178 - Burbine v. Moran

Burbine v. Moran’s Empirical Analysis

753 F.2d 178 · 1985

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2018

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

1401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · North Carolina v. Butler · Lehman Bros. v. Lilly · People v. Hobson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. the relationship of the suspect to the attorney, 2. the extent of the knowledge possessed by the authorities, 3. the conduct of the authorities, 4. the nature of the attorney’s request, and 5. the background, experience and conduct of the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that the failure to inform a suspect in custody that his attorney or an attorney retained for him was seeking to see him vitiated his waiver of his Fifth Amendment right to assistance of counsel at his questioning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no other explanation for the refusal to tell Burbine of Attorney Munson's call than . . . deliberate or reckless irresponsibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.