Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 753 F.2d 363 - Thompson v. Prince William County

Thompson v. Prince William County’s Empirical Analysis

753 F.2d 363 · 1985

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Rodriguez v. Farrell (2002), William Brady and Theresa Brady v. Maryann Dill et al. (1999)

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

1101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Illinois v. Gates · Mary B. Sigmon v. William E. Poe, Individually

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t simply demands too much to expect police officers on the basis of slight discrepancies of height ... and weight or in color of eyes ... and hair ... to abandon obtention or execution of a warrant on someone who, for other strong indications ..., meets the warrant’s description.”). 6 . Lieutenant Wiita is also entitled to qualified immunity with respect to the state false imprisonment claim, as it is settled Virginia law that an officer cannot be found liable for false imprisonment if he acted”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]ot every mix-up in the issuance of the arrest warrant, even though it leads to the arrest of the wrong person, with attendant inconvenience and humiliation, automatically constitutes a constitutional violation for which a remedy may be sought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.