Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 753 F.2d 712 - Nuttelman

Nuttelman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
May 2007
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2007

1 district ·

40198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co. · Marvel v. United States · Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. v. United States · Professional Engineers, Inc. v. United States · Hansen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1.) If the person receiving the benefit of a service has the right to control the manner in which the service is performed, the person rendering the service may be an employee. 2.) If a person rendering a service has a substantial investment in his own tools or equipment, he may be an independent contractor. 3.) If a person performing a service undertakes a substantial cost, say by employing and paying his own laborers, he may be an independent contractor. 4.) If a person performing a service has an opportunity to profit depending on his management skill, he may be an independent contractor. 5.) If a service rendered requires a special skill, the person rendering it may be an independent contractor. 6.) If the relationship between a person rendering a service and the person receiving it is permanent, it may be an employment relationship. 7.) If a person rendering a service works in the course of the recipient’s business, rather than in some ancillary capacity, he may be an employee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]othing in [the Nuttelmans'] complaint even remotely suggests that they fall within the statutory exceptions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.