Zepeda v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
753 F.2d 719 · 1983
Citation profile
76 federal appellate · 16 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 178 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Bonin v. Calderon (1995), Lawson Products, Inc. v. Avnet, Inc. (1986)
76 federal appellate · 16 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 8 U.S.C. § 1357 (§ 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · United States v. Mendenhall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must consider whether the decision was based on a consideration of the relevant factors and whether there has been a clear error of judgment.... The [reviewing] court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the [district court].”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[r]eview of an order granting or denying a preliminary injunction is much more limited than review of a permanent injunction'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A federal court may issue an injunction if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the claim; it may not attempt to determine the rights of persons not before the court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.