Trezziova v. Kohn’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Madoff Securities, by contrast, fraudulently induced attempted investments in covered securities, albeit through feeder funds (not alleged in the instant complaints as anything other than intermediaries), and the defendant banks are alleged to have furthered that scheme. Madoff Securities’ victims thus “tried to take ... an ownership position in the statutorily relevant securities,” he., covered securities. That Madoff Securities (a Ponzi scheme) fraudulently failed to follow through on its promise to place the investments in covered securities does not in any respect remove this case from the ambit of SLUSA as defined in Troice.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hill v. HSBS Bank PLC

2. “the fraud perpetrated by [E*TRADE must be] material to a decision by one or more individuals (other than the fraudster) to buy or to sell a covered security.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Rayner v. E*Trade Fin. Corp.

3. “[F]raudulent manipulation of stock prices-unquestionably qualifies as fraud 'in connection with the purchase or sale' of securities ....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Rayner v. E*Trade Fin. Corp.