Abdullah v. Obama’s Empirical Analysis
753 F.3d 193 · 2014
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 19 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mazurek v. Armstrong · Hamdi v. Rumsfeld · Quirin Haupt Kerling Burger Heinck Thiel Neubauer United States Quirin v. Cox Usa 6 · Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must establish [1] that he is likely to succeed on the merits, [2] that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, [3] that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and [4] that an injunction is in the public interest.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“'the movant has the burden to show that all four factors, taken together, weigh in favor of the injunction.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“clear showing that four factors, taken together, warrant relief: [1] likely success on the merits, [2] likely irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, [3] a balance of the equities in its favor, and [4] accord with the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Shvartser v. Lekser
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.